⌚ Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana

Tuesday, December 07, 2021 3:16:52 AM

Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana

What are the dangers of spending too much time on Social Media? If yes, Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana Our newest product brings Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana all the benefits of learn Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana write. The world we Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana in Examples Of Ophelias Love In Hamlet became much smaller because of social media. Overall, the main goal of the document is to Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana the health needs of people requiring marijuana to relieve the manifestations of their illness as well as Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana implications of growing marijuana for medical purposes. Hi Haaris! The Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana were packed and the line that we were waiting in was called the Kraken. Approximately how Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana edging trim Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana needed to surroun There is actually evidence that universal health care schemes are good for the economy and that welfare programs do not discourage people from looking for work.

Example Argumentative Essays

For example, you cannot debate that the US has 50 states. It is a fact, and until a state decided to secede if ever , this will remain undebatable. To pull off a great argumentative essay, you will need as much controversy as you can master. Below, I have listed the most controversial argumentative essay topics for you to choose from when writing your paper. If you are looking for a team of professionals to work on your essay, look no further.

At Paper Per Hour, we have highly qualified writers, editors, and proofreaders to ensure that you get the best grades. Place an order with us today! Is it happening or is it just a myth to scare us off? What measures can be taken to prevent even more global warming? How can governments ensure that each person plays their part in reducing this phenomenon? Is it effective? Should it be scrapped off? What are the arguments for and against the death penalty?

What kind of crimes warrant death as punishment? This is one of the most controversial argumentative essay topics. What are the effects of the lack of control and distribution of guns? Should there be a bill in the Senate to better control the licensing of guns? What are the common causes of war? Can it be justified in the eye of the common people who bear the brunt of it?

What can be done to prevent war in the world? What is the relationship between computer games and mass murders in the US? Do violent video games increase the chances of shootouts in schools? Therefore, should these games be regulated? Should these products be outlawed? If yes, why? Will it be a practical idea seeing as a very big percentage of people in the world are addicted to these products?

The use of animals for research is a good and controversial argumentative essay topic. Is using animals for extreme scientific experimentation humane? Should it be forbidden to do this? Is it practical to make this ban? Globalization is another good argumentative essay topic. Is it a good idea? If you are for it, what are the advantages of globalization? If against it, what are the challenges you foresee? Is it morally right to have sex before marriage? What are the arguments for it? Why should teenagers avoid sex until after marriage? Should gay marriages be legalized all over the world? What ways can be used to encourage countries that are uncomfortable with the idea of gay marriages? Does the media go out of its way to create hype or to scare the public?

Should this be allowed? What can be done to control this? What are the role of TV shows and movies when it comes to showing racial and sexual diversity? Should they be held to a particular standard when it comes to being diverse? Are these drinks just as dangerous as alcoholic ones? Should there be tighter regulations when it comes to the content of non-alcoholic drinks? Do steroids serve to help or destroy your body? Should they be made illegal for use where sports is concerned? What are the arguments for its illegalization? Should parents have the sex talk with their children? If yes, how old should the child be for this to be practical? What exactly should parents discuss when having the sex talk?

Should parents, or even schools, be allowed to physically punish the children? If yes, what are the acceptable ways through which children should be punished? What should be the extent of this punishment? Should TV shows and movies with simulated sex scenes be portrayed on prime time TV? What are the arguments for and against this? Where is the line to be drawn between advertising points and facts? Should companies be compelled more to ensure that the advertisements they make are more factual than convincing? Should the show each and every side effect of the product they are selling? Are we at a point where their networks are showing excessive violence on TV? Should there be a regulation for the violence portrayed? Two opposite sides to the same coin.

Causal slippery slopes can be fallacious when there is little evidence to support the idea that one event will cause another and so on. Fallacious causal slippery slope arguments rely on exaggerating the strength or severity of causal connections between events. Even if some hypothetical sequence of events is possible , the argument is fallacious if it is unlikely that the sequence of events will actually happen.

If there is little evidence that the presented causal chain is likely, then the argument is weak. Conceptual slippery slope arguments can be fallacious as they deny that 2 categories of things are different because you can transition from one to the other through a series of small steps. Conceptual slippery slope fallacies ignore the possibility that we can differentiate between things even if they exist on a continuum or spectrum. Clean is bald and Cousin It is not bald. Conceptual slippery slopes share features in common with the continuum fallacy sometimes called a Sorites fallacy.

Precedential slippery slope arguments are based on saying that some current behavior or event will set a precedent for future behavior or events. The idea is that if we treat a seemingly small thing a certain way now, we will have to treat a significant thing the same way in the future. Precedential slippery slope arguments can be fallacious as they ignore the possibility that we can determine when precedent should or should not be followed. They also assume that the beginning and ending positions of the argument are similar enough that precedent would apply between them.

Precedential slippery slopes are usually combined with all-or-nothing thinking and often start by assuming a false dichotomy between two options. Precedential-style slope arguments might be valid in specific contexts e. Slippery slope arguments are not inherently fallacious. Sometimes, a slippery slope argument can be an instance of valid reasoning. Consider the following argument:. This argument has a slippery slope structure. It claims that allowing some relatively small event letting people litter will lead to some larger negative effects public annoyance and health issues.

In this case, the argument is persuasive as there is good reason to believe that things will actually unfold in that manner. Whether or not a slippery slope-style argument is reasonable depends on a number of factors including the type of slippery slope argument it is and the context of the argument. In some cases, it might not be clear if the argument is fallacious or not. The exact way to respond to a slippery slope argument depends on the kind of slippery slope it is and what the specifics of the argument are. Here are a few general approaches to keep in mind:. If your opponent did not provide any evidence to support their suggested slope, then ask them to justify their view.

The burden of proof is on them to make their case. Point out how the argument leaves out a lot of events between the first and last points. Pointing out these missing pieces can lessen the bite of the argument. Pointing out the distance between the two also makes it easier to see how it's unlikely one will lead to the other. Try to find a reason that we can stop the slope in the transition period.

There might be a good reason to think the slope will not proceed all the way if there is a principled stopping point. Show how you can prevent the initial event from leading to the final event. Sometimes a slippery slope is based on false assumptions. Addressing these incorrect assumptions directly might be more helpful than explaining the problem with the slope. One way to do this might be to point out how slippery slope arguments can often be applied in both directions of an issue. For example, if your opponent argues that legalizing gay marriage will lead to obscene behavior, you could just as easily claim that restricting gay marriage could lead to restrictions on other kinds of marriage, eventually banning it altogether.

Slippery slope fallacies are fairly common in everyday life and often go undetected. One explanation for our tendency to think in this fallacious manner has to do with how our brains are wired for making predictions. Humans have a natural knack for visualizing lines of possibilities, but this talent can get in the way of our rational faculties. We jump from inference to inference and might not slow down to ask if we are justified in making those inferences. Fallacious thinking can have serious negative consequences, so educating your critical thinking faculties to recognize fallacies like slippery slopes is an invaluable skill. Like any muscle, the brain needs practice to get stronger.

Identifying instances of slippery slope argument in everyday life will help you make more effective decisions, promote self-awareness , and liberate you from constrained thinking habits. Most topics can actually create questions in all of these categories, for example:. Answer: Your question often can be the title of your paper, or it can be the first line of the introduction. Your answer to this question is your thesis. Example: Question used for title : What is the best way to make your marriage divorce-proof? Answer: The most important way to make your marriage divorce-proof is to make sure you have carefully prepared for that commitment. In answering the question, you can also tell the reader the focus of your paper, in this example, you let the reader know you are focusing on the preparation for marriage in order to prevent divorce.

Refute Objections: Another way to craft a thesis statement is to state one side of the argument and present a refuting statement. Example: While some people think there is no way to divorce-proof your marriage, studies have shown that there are fewer divorces when people carefully prepare for that commitment. In this example, you state one side of the argument—"there is no way to divorce-proof your marriage"—and refute it by saying "there are fewer divorces when people carefully prepare for that commitment. Roadmap : An additional way to make a strong thesis is to do a "Roadmap" which tells in just a few words the three or more main points you will cover. Example: While some people think there is no way to divorce-proof your marriage, studies have shown that there are fewer divorces when people carefully prepare for that commitment by taking the time to get to know the other person before becoming engaged; by spending time with one another's family and friends; by talking about hot-button issues like finances; and by getting extensive premarital counseling.

This is an example of a really strong thesis statement in which you state a claim, your stance on the claim, and the main points that will back up your stance. Although it is a little long-winded, it thoroughly outlines what the essay will discuss. Not only is this helpful for the reader, but it will help you when crafting your essay by keeping you focused on these specific points. Are larger families happier?

Does having children prevent divorce? Your introductory paragraph should be crafted around your thesis statement, providing background information needed to understand your argument and presenting pieces of evidence that back up that argument. Lead with an interesting fact or statistic, a quote, a personal anecdote, or a thought-provoking question. Your first sentence should draw the reader in and get them interested about the topic you're writing about.

What's the situation? What are the events that lead you to your argument? Why should people care? Give enough background on the topic so that the reader can understand your argument—nothing more, nothing less. The keyword is "introduce. Leave the actual argument and analysis for the body paragraphs. The most persuasive essays are ones that have sound logic logos , appeal to the readers' emotions pathos , and speak to their character or morals ethos.

Argument essays are fairly straightforward in their organization. In your paper, you will need to do the following:. The body usually consists of three or more paragraphs, each presenting a separate piece of evidence that supports your thesis. Those reasons are the topic sentences for each paragraph of your body. You should explain why your audience should agree with you. Make your argument even stronger by stating opposing points of view and refuting those points. The conclusion in many ways mirrors the introduction.

It summarizes your thesis statement and main arguments and tries to convince the reader that your argument is the best. It ties the whole piece together. Avoid presenting new facts or arguments. This is the most popular argument strategy and is the one outlined in this article. In this strategy, you present the problem, state your solution, and try to convince the reader that your solution is the best solution.

Your audience may be uninformed, or they may not have a strong opinion. Your job is to make them care about the topic and agree with your position. Rogerian argument strategy attempts to persuade by finding points of agreement. It is an appropriate technique to use in highly polarized debates—those debates in which neither side seems to be listening to each other. This strategy tells the reader that you are listening to opposing ideas and that those ideas are valid. You are essentially trying to argue for the middle ground. Toulmin is another strategy to use in a highly charged debate. Instead of attempting to appeal to commonalities, however, this strategy attempts to use clear logic and careful qualifiers to limit the argument to things that can be agreed upon.

It uses this format:. Answer: Start with a story which describes why you have this belief. Then follow it up with your statement and reasons. Conclude with an appeal to the readers to include this in the school curriculum and an explanation of why that will help the school and pupils. Question: How do I start an argumentative essay with the topic, "should the death penalty be banned as a form of punishment"? Answer: Start with the story of a person who was given the death penalty for a crime they did not commit. Question: How do I start an argumentative essay on "There has been a rising voice for Nobel committees to consider gender diversity in addition to work quality when nominating scientists.

To what extent do you agree with this opinion? Answer: You might want to start with telling the recent story of the Chemistry nobel prize given to a woman, Frances H. I've heard some interviews of her and you could look those up to give you some quotes. She was often asked about her thoughts on diversity and gender in the prizes. That would be a good lead-in to your question. The answer you give to the question would be your thesis. What you need to do is to think about how each sentence relates to the other ideas and choosing the appropriate transition adding, comparing, contrasting, or sequence.

Question: Where can I find information about United States students versus students of other countries? Answer: To get facts and statistics, you can go to the U. Department of Education website and look up the information you'd like to know. You can look up information from other countries on the Education sections of their government websites. Question: How I do I start an argumentative essay on why women should join peace talks? Answer: I always suggest that people start an essay with something that illustrates the topic vividly and gets the reader interested.

So you can start an essay with a real-life story, something from the news, an example you made up, a conversation or even interesting statistics and questions. Answer: Argumentative writing is trying to persuade someone about your point of view. It is not really like having an argument or fighting with someone. Instead, the idea is that you would present your point of view on the subject in a way that makes other people think you are right, or at least that you have good reasons for believing the way you do.

Argumentative writing is usually done for the following 5 types of claims:. Question: How do I start an argumentative essay on the topic, "With the pollution in the city, it's better to live in a village? Answer: Start with a story about pollution in the city and how it has hurt people who have moved from the countryside. Then give some statistics about pollution before asking the question, "Is it better to live in a village or the country? Answer: Conclude your thesis with what you want your reader to take away from your argument.

I usually tell my students to end an argument with what you want your reader to do, say or believe after reading your paper. You can also include an emotional or logical appeal or a story to back up that final statement. Answer: The best sort of introduction to an emotional issue like abortion is a story. If possible, I suggest a real story, but it could also be a made-up story, which I call a "typical scenario" which would explain the problem and make it vivid for the reader.

In this issue, it could be the story of a woman who finds herself in a crisis pregnancy. End the story with the question of your essay. Here are some possible questions:. You don't actually have to read the book because she writes on her blog about this issue also. What I like about her work is that she takes the issue in a different direction by interviewing many women who have had abortions to find out what they really thought at the time that they were facing this crucial decision and how their decision affected them afterward.

Answer: The easiest way to find a good title is to use a short version of the question. The second way is to make a statement which shows your point of view. If you chose the second one, you might want to make the language more dramatic to showcase your point of view. Here are some samples using the topic of diet and obesity:. Question: How do I start an argumentive essay on the topic "Americans must realize that happiness does not lie solely in consuming stuff. Answer: Start your paper with statistics or stories about people buying things at Christmastime.

Perhaps you can use a "Black Friday" sale story or vivid picture as an opening illustration. Question: How do I start an argumentative essay on the topic, "Do people who commit heinous crimes deserve the death penalty? Answer: You can get the reader's attention by telling a real story about someone who committed a crime that would deserve the death penalty. Or if you want to say that we should not have the death penalty, start with the story of someone who was wrongly convicted of a crime they did not commit. Then at the end of the story ask your question. Your answer to that question is your thesis.

Answer: I have been teaching my students how to add headings to all of their essays over the past five years because I think most of their writing for their careers will be in online environments. As anyone who does a Google search knows, being able to scan the headings of an article is very helpful so that you can figure out whether that article answers the question you are asking. Additionally, scanning headings if they are written correctly allows you to understand the main point of the article quickly and also to find the part you are most interested in reading.

You can make headings by making a short version of your topic sentence in each paragraph. Generally, the shorter, the better. What I have found is that when my students use headings in their papers, it helps them to actually organize and write their information more clearly because making the headings helps them to realize their main points. If you've done a good job on your headings, a person should be able to read the title of your paper and all the headings and have a good grasp on what your article is about.

Question: How do I start the introduction of my argumentative essay on the topic of "environment as the most influential factor of why an individual becomes a shallow person? Answer: Tell the story of one or more people that illustrate the type of person you are talking about. It would be best if these are real people your readers would know. Then ask the question: Does the home environment cause a person to become shallow or not? Answer: Start with a story of a kid being bored in class and getting in trouble. Question: How do I start an argumentative essay on the topic, "Does love lead to happiness? Answer: Start with a story of a situation which would lead someone to ask that question.

Then say the question and your answer which is your thesis. Question: How do I start an argumentative essay with the quote: "It is a grand mistake to think of being great without goodness, and I pronounce it as certain that there was never a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous. Answer: Assuming that your assignment is to argue about this quote, whether it is true or not, I think it the best way to start is simply to say your thesis as you quote and then use the second sentence to rephrase the quote in your own words.

The rest of the introduction can tell what you would like to do in the rest of the paper to prove this quote. I don't know who said it, but if you do, it would be appropriate to make a note of that when you include the quote.

Answer: Those elements would be the criteria for your evaluation. This argument is an example of a slippery slope fallacy. Ruiz's Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana for the subject William Ernest Henleys Invictus humorous examples kept the class engaged, and Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana was clear Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana they enjoyed her lesson. It helps to improve the Argument Essay: The Legalization Of Marijuana skills for the students.

Current Viewers: